GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence

透過 Astra，我們為 Codex 推出一種在上下文視窗用盡時保留及找回內容的新方法。過去，模型會在長時間工作階段中，例如在偵錯複雜問題或處理大規模重構時，運用壓縮上下文來摘要工作內容。每次壓縮都可能遺漏某項修正為何失敗，或某個元件如何運作的詳細資訊。在 Codex 中，Astra 可以跨上下文視窗保留筆記，保存累積的細節，不必反覆把所有內容壓成一份摘要。先前的上下文視窗仍可供搜尋，即使筆記未收錄相關資訊，Astra 仍可從先前的訊息和工具輸出中找到需求或測試結果。你可以在 Codex 的 config.toml⁠(在新視窗中開啟) 中啟用這項實驗功能，這項功能將在未來幾週內成為 Astra 的預設設定。

Given concerns that exposure to historical software vulnerabilities may have affected benchmark results, we also evaluated Astra on two novel benchmarks. For one, we built an internal “ExploitBench (June–August 2026)” evaluation to test exploit development using vulnerabilities from the previous three months.¹⁴ Astra achieved substantially higher arbitrary code-execution rates than GPT‑5.6 Sol on this dataset while using far fewer output tokens. During the evaluation, Astra even discovered and used two previously unknown zero-day vulnerabilities. We are disclosing both vulnerabilities to their maintainers.

We also tested Astra on SRE-Bench¹⁵, a benchmark that measures whether models can reverse engineer software binaries to understand its core logic without access to raw source code. Astra solved 88.0% of tasks in a single attempt and 99.2% within four attempts, compared with 55.9% and 68.7% for GPT‑5.6 Sol, respectively.

Beyond benchmarks, expert-led assessments found that Astra, when run without production safeguards, could use previously unknown vulnerabilities to achieve arbitrary code execution in hardened browsers and create privilege-escalation exploits for hardened operating-systems.

As we discussed in The Defender’s Window, frontier cyber capabilities can help defenders find weaknesses faster, but they also make those weaknesses easier to exploit, raising the urgency for defenders to adapt. With the version of Astra launching today, defenders can use it to complete tasks such as secure code review and patching.

However, Astra will refuse to comply with more advanced cybersecurity tasks such as creating proof-of-concept exploits for vulnerabilities. Through OpenAI Daybreak⁠, we plan to expand access and roll out less restrictive safeguards in the coming weeks. This will enable more defensive workflows, including vulnerability and proof-of-concept validation, malware analysis, and detection engineering.

We have also strengthened our protections against potential cyber misuse, building upon our safeguards stack for GPT‑5.6 Sol. These include stronger model robustness to better withstand potential jailbreaks and more context for our monitoring systems. We have continued rigorous internal and external testing, including automated evaluations with our internal red-teaming attackers. More details about our cyber safeguards and testing are available in the Astra safety overview⁠ and system card⁠(在新視窗中開啟)..

Our evaluations found Astra’s written reasoning harder to monitor than GPT‑5.6 Sol’s, based on tests that explicitly asked it to evade monitoring. We attribute this to Astra’s greater control over written reasoning on simpler tasks and ability to solve problems with fewer written steps. Astra still appears to struggle to conceal the reasoning needed for complex tasks, but we take the decline seriously. Improving monitorability remains a research priority, and the accompanying system card⁠(在新視窗中開啟) details our findings and ongoing work.

Alignment training is core to our approach to deployment. As an additional layer of defenses, we also build system safeguards like Codex Auto-review⁠(在新視窗中開啟) and monitoring agents’ reasoning and actions to help detect and contain unsafe behavior. As described in our safety update⁠, we are also deploying misalignment monitoring in production for Astra-class models in order to have visibility into misalignment, and help contain its worst instances. These safeguards resemble our monitoring for internal deployments and involve a system of classifiers which check the model’s reasoning and actions for unauthorized behavior and automatically stop potentially unauthorized activity.

Given the significant increase in Astra’s cybersecurity capabilities, we are being especially careful to make this deployment safe and secure. Extra safety checks can sometimes slow, pause, or stop legitimate work, including defensive cybersecurity. If a task is paused in ChatGPT or Codex, you may be asked to review the action before continuing. In the API, the task will stop. These checks can sometimes interrupt legitimate work, and we are continuing to iterate on this system to reduce unnecessary interruptions. Misalignment monitoring cannot replace alignment: our goal is to build models that reliably stay within their authorized scope, so these protections do not need to intervene.

GPT‑6 Astra is rolling out today to a limited set of organizations and over the coming days will become available to all ChatGPT Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise users, as well as through the OpenAI API, Microsoft Azure, and AWS Bedrock. Astra usage is included within the existing subscription allowances—users and businesses will also be able to purchase credits for additional usage. Users on the Pro, Business, and Enterprise plans will also get access to GPT‑6 Astra Pro. Enterprise administrators can enable Astra for their workspace; access is off by default at launch.

Astra supports Zero Data Retention for eligible API customers, and as we shared last month, we're testing Private Safety Processing to strengthen safety monitoring while preserving customer privacy.

For developers, GPT‑6 Astra will be available in the OpenAI API as gpt-6-astra and through Microsoft Azure and Amazon Bedrock.

OpenAI API Standard pricing is $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens. Separate rates apply to cache reads and writes. Fast mode is available for GPT‑6 Astra in the API and delivers up to 2x the speed of Standard processing at 2x the Standard price.