Apple qed tiżbalja f’dan
Apple hija waħda mill-akbar kumpaniji ta’ kull żmien u bniet reputazzjoni fuq l-attenzjoni ossessiva tagħha għall-iżgħar dettalji. Sfortunatament, din il-kawża traskurata, aggressiva u strambament personali ma tilħaqx dik ir-reputazzjoni.
Apple kienet sostniet li kkuntattjat lil OpenAI fi Frar u li aħna ma weġibniex. Issa tammetti li l-avukati esterni tagħha bagħtu email lill-persuna żbaljata wara li ħawdu żewġ kunjomijiet Asjatiċi—u dan biss wara li ġbidnilha l-attenzjoni għalih. Apple sostniet ukoll li kellha diskussjoni mal-Konsulent Legali Ġenerali tagħna, iżda issa tammetti li din qatt ma seħħet. Iżda terġa’ taħbi l-fatt li dak iż-żmien qatt ma qajmet l-allegazzjonijiet speċifiċi f’din il-kawża, u li fil-fatt qaltilna li kienet qed “issolvi kwalunkwe kwistjoni”. Imbagħad ma smajna xejn għal ħames xhur, sakemm fetħet il-kawża. Fl-aħħar att ippreżentat tagħha, Apple tagħmel sforz kbir biex tagħti dehra differenti lil din is-sensiela ta’ avvenimenti, iżda tista’ sempliċement taqra l-emails int stess hawnhekk.
Apple takkuża lil Chang Liu li aċċessa informazzjoni kunfidenzjali tagħha wara li telaq mill-kumpanija, iżda issa biss tammetti li impjegati ta’ Apple kkuntattjawh u talbuh jgħinhom isibu din l-informazzjoni (tista’ taqra l-messaġġi hawnhekk). Apple issa tipprova titfa’ t-tort fuq “aċċess residwu”, iżda lanqas ma tiżvela li din hija problema komuni magħha, ikkawżata min-nuqqas tagħha li timmaniġġja sew l-aċċess għas-sistemi meta jitilqu n-nies. Fil-prattika, dan ifisser li eks impjegati li jippruvaw jagħmlu t-tajjeb meta jitilqu xorta jibqgħu b’aċċess għall-fajls ta’ Apple—minkejja li la jriduh u lanqas biss ikunu jafu bih.
Apple takkuża wkoll lil Tang Tan li pprova jikseb u juża s-sigrieti kummerċjali tagħha. Madankollu, Tang dejjem għamilha ċara mat-tim li aħna ma rridu ebda informazzjoni kunfidenzjali minn kumpaniji oħra u li ma għandna nużaw xejn minnha. Tang ħadem ma’ Apple għal aktar minn 24 sena u kien magħruf sew bħala wieħed mill-aktar mexxejja innovattivi fil-kumpanija.
Nixtiequ li Apple qajmet dawn il-kwistjonijiet magħna qabel fetħet il-kawża tagħha, u konna nkunu kuntenti niċċaraw dan kollu magħha. Ħadna bis-serjetà l-allegazzjonijiet fil-kawża u offrejna li naħdmu ma’ Apple biex insolvu din il-kwistjoni. Minflok, qed tipprova tibdel il-verżjoni tagħha, fost l-oħrajn billi tagħmel akkużi vagi dwar eks impjegati oħra, u x’aktarx se tibqa’ tirrepeti din it-tattika.
It-talba ta’ Apple għal inġunzjoni preliminari hija bbażata fuq informazzjoni falza u hija għalkollox bla bżonn, għaliex la għandna u lanqas irridu xi sigriet kummerċjali tagħha. Aħna ferm aktar interessati li nibnu prodotti u teknoloġiji innovattivi li jwessgħu l-limiti ta’ dak li hu possibbli.
Aġġornament tas-6 ta’ Awwissu 2026: Tista’ taqra r-rikors tagħna għaċ-ċaħda hawnhekk(jinfetaħ f’tieqa ġdida).
Aġġornament tal-1 ta’ Settembru 2026: Tista’ taqra l-oġġezzjoni tagħna għall-mozzjoni ta’ Apple għal inġunzjoni preliminari hawnhekk(jinfetaħ f’tieqa ġdida).
Aġġornament tal-14 ta’ Settembru 2026: Ir-risposta tagħna għan-nota supplimentari ta’ Apple tinsab hawnhekk(jinfetaħ f’tieqa ġdida).
Messaġġi
iMessages bejn Chang Liu (bil-blu) u impjegati ta’ Apple, fejn Chang—li l-aħħar jum tiegħu ma’ Apple kien it-22 ta’ Jannar 2026—qed jintalab mill-eks kollegi tiegħu jgħinhom isibu fajls u informazzjoni biex ikunu jistgħu jwettqu xogħolhom ma’ Apple (il-ħinijiet kollha huma skont l-UTC). Nota: ismijiet ta’ individwi oħra u informazzjoni kunfidenzjali ta’ Apple tneħħew.


Korrispondenza bl-email
L-emails li ġejjin huma bejn Gabriel Gross, il-konsulent legali estern ta’ Apple; Che Chang, il-Konsulent Legali Ġenerali ta’ OpenAI; u l-konsulenti legali interni ta’ Apple. Dawn juru li Gross bagħat email lil Che bi żball u sostna b’mod mhux preċiż li t-tnejn kienu tkellmu. Kemm Gross kif ukoll il-konsulenti legali interni ta’ Apple sussegwentement ikkonfermaw li dan kien żball, u Gross innota li kienu qed “isolvu kwalunkwe kwistjoni”. L-allegazzjonijiet speċifiċi fil-kawża ta’ Apple qatt ma tqajmu, u ma kien hemm ebda kuntatt ieħor qabel ma nfetħet il-kawża ħames xhur wara.
Dear Mr. Chang:
Please see the attached letter and let me know when you are free to discuss it.
Yours,
Gabriel Gross Partner Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP <redacted> <redacted> <redacted> Direct <redacted> Mobile
The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by email, <redacted> and destroy the original message. Thank you.
Attachments:
- image001.jpg (6K)
- 2026.02.23 G. Gross letter to <redacted> Wang(101156327.1).pdf (225K)
- Ex. A.pdf (491K)
- Ex. B.pdf (91K)
- Ex. C.pdf (1646K)
Dear Mr. Chang:
Thank you for your phone call just now and for offering your cooperation so quickly. I will be back in touch after speaking with Apple. I realize I neglected to include the three attachments when I sent you my letter, so I am re-sending it with the attachments for your records.
Yours,
Gabe
Hi [Apple in-house legal counsel] and [Apple in-house legal counsel],
This guy from Weil claims to be representing you. For some reason, he is lying about speaking with me on the phone. I don't know who he is and we have never spoken.
I don't know what the point of his lie is, but could you please confirm if he is actually representing you, and if so, whether you have other counsel you can use. I don’t think interacting through him is appropriate given this behavior.
If this isn’t the right Apple team, could you let me know who might be? Thank you.
Che
Dear Mr. Chang:
I write to follow up on my email and letter from yesterday. After I emailed you around 5:53 p.m. yesterday, I inadvertently also sent you another email around 6:07 p.m. that was intended for <redacted> Wang, one of the former Apple employees at issue. After we had emailed Mr. Wang yesterday about retaining Apple information, he promptly called me and offered to cooperate with Apple in resolving any issues. I then intended to email him again, but accidentally replied to my email chain with you instead. I apologize for the confusion that likely caused.
Yours,
Gabriel Gross Partner Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP <redacted> <redacted> <redacted> Direct <redacted> Mobile
Gabe
Hi Che,
Wanted to make sure to get back to you. Weil is our counsel on this matter, and I believe they should have contacted you explaining the miscommunication. Please feel free to direct any additional questions their way.
Thanks,
[Apple in-house legal counsel]


