Apple kliru babagan iki
Apple iku salah siji perusahaan paling apik ing salawas-lawase, lan misuwur amarga nggatekake nganti rincian sing paling cilik. Sayange, gugatan sing sembrana, agresif, lan aneh amarga kaya nyerang pribadi iki ora cocog karo reputasi kasebut.
Apple ngaku wis ngubungi OpenAI ing wulan Februari lan kita ora nanggapi. Saiki dheweke ngakoni yen pengacara njabane ngirim email menyang wong sing kliru amarga kleru mbedakake rong jeneng kulawarga Asia—lan mung ngakoni sawise kita nuduhake perkara iki. Apple uga ngaku wis rembugan karo Kepala Bagian Hukum kita, nanging saiki ngakoni yen rembugan kasebut ora tau kedadeyan. Nanging, dheweke maneh ndhelikake kasunyatan yen wektu kuwi dheweke ora tau ngandharake tuduhan khusus ing gugatan iki, lan malah kandha marang kita yen dheweke lagi “ngrampungake masalah apa wae”. Sawise kuwi, limang wulan suwene kita ora krungu kabar apa-apa nganti dheweke ngajokake gugatan. Ing dokumen paling anyar sing diajokake, Apple ngupaya banget kanggo mbingkai runtutan kedadeyan iki miturut versine, nanging sampeyan bisa maca dhewe email-email kasebut ing kene.
Apple nuduh Chang Liu ngakses informasi rahasia Apple sawise metu saka perusahaan, nanging lagi saiki ngakoni yen karyawan Apple sing ngubungi dheweke lan njaluk tulung kanggo nggoleki informasi kasebut (sampeyan bisa maca pesen-pesene ing kene). Saiki Apple nyoba ngoper kaluputan marang “akses sing isih kari”, nanging uga ora ngandharake yen iki masalah umum ing Apple, sing kedadeyan amarga dheweke ora ngatur akses sistem kanthi bener nalika ana wong metu. Ing praktik, iki ateges mantan karyawan sing nyoba tumindak kanthi bener nalika metu isih bisa ngakses berkas Apple—senajan ora kepengin duwe akses kasebut utawa malah ora ngerti yen akses kasebut isih ana.
Apple uga nuduh Tang Tan nyoba njupuk lan nggunakake rahasia dagange. Nanging, Tang tansah negesake marang tim yen kita ora kepengin lan ora kena nggunakake informasi rahasia apa wae saka perusahaan liya. Tang ngabdi ing Apple luwih saka 24 taun lan dikenal akeh wong minangka salah siji pimpinan paling inovatif ing perusahaan kasebut.
Kita kepengin Apple wis ngandharake masalah-masalah iki marang kita sadurunge ngajokake gugatan, lan kita mesthi seneng njlentrehake kabeh iki marang dheweke. Kita nanggapi tuduhan ing gugatan iki kanthi serius lan wis nawakake kerja bareng karo Apple kanggo ngrampungake perkara iki. Nanging, dheweke malah nyoba ngowahi narasine, kalebu kanthi nggawe tuduhan samar marang mantan karyawan liyane, lan kamungkinan bakal terus mbaleni cara iki.
Panjaluke Apple kanggo prentah pengadilan sauntara adhedhasar informasi palsu lan babar pisan ora perlu, amarga kita ora duwe lan uga ora kepengin duwe rahasia dagange. Kita luwih kepengin nggawe produk lan teknologi inovatif sing nyurung wates kemajuan.
Anyaran 6 Agustus 2026: Sampeyan bisa maca Mosi Penolakan Gugatan saka kita ing kene(mbukak ing jendhela anyar).
Anyaran 1 September 2026: Sampeyan bisa maca tanggapan kita sing nolak mosi Apple kanggo prentah pengadilan sauntara ing kene(mbukak ing jendhela anyar).
Anyaran 14 September 2026: Tanggapan kita marang ringkesan tambahan saka Apple bisa diwaca ing kene(mbukak ing jendhela anyar).
Pesen
iMessage antarane Chang Liu (warna biru) lan karyawan Apple, sing nuduhake Chang—sing dina pungkasan kerjane ing Apple yaiku 22 Januari 2026—dijaluki tulung dening mantan kanca kerjane kanggo nggoleki berkas lan informasi guna mbantu pakaryane ing Apple (kabeh wektu nganggo UTC). Cathetan: jeneng wong liya lan informasi rahasia Apple wis disamarke.


Korespondensi email
Email-email ing ngisor iki dikirim antarane pengacara njaba Apple, Gabriel Gross; Kepala Bagian Hukum OpenAI, Che Chang; lan penasihat hukum internal Apple. Email kasebut nuduhake yen Gross kliru ngirim email marang Che lan kanthi ora bener ngaku yen dheweke sakloron wis tau rembugan. Gross lan penasihat hukum internal Apple banjur ngonfirmasi yen iki sawijining kekliruan, lan Gross nyatakake yen dheweke lagi “ngrampungake masalah apa wae”. Klaim-klaim khusus ing gugatan Apple ora tau diandharake, lan ora ana tindak lanjut maneh sadurunge gugatan diajokake limang wulan sabanjure.
Dear Mr. Chang:
Please see the attached letter and let me know when you are free to discuss it.
Yours,
Gabriel Gross Partner Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP <redacted> <redacted> <redacted> Direct <redacted> Mobile
The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by email, <redacted> and destroy the original message. Thank you.
Attachments:
- image001.jpg (6K)
- 2026.02.23 G. Gross letter to <redacted> Wang(101156327.1).pdf (225K)
- Ex. A.pdf (491K)
- Ex. B.pdf (91K)
- Ex. C.pdf (1646K)
Dear Mr. Chang:
Thank you for your phone call just now and for offering your cooperation so quickly. I will be back in touch after speaking with Apple. I realize I neglected to include the three attachments when I sent you my letter, so I am re-sending it with the attachments for your records.
Yours,
Gabe
Hi [Apple in-house legal counsel] and [Apple in-house legal counsel],
This guy from Weil claims to be representing you. For some reason, he is lying about speaking with me on the phone. I don't know who he is and we have never spoken.
I don't know what the point of his lie is, but could you please confirm if he is actually representing you, and if so, whether you have other counsel you can use. I don’t think interacting through him is appropriate given this behavior.
If this isn’t the right Apple team, could you let me know who might be? Thank you.
Che
Dear Mr. Chang:
I write to follow up on my email and letter from yesterday. After I emailed you around 5:53 p.m. yesterday, I inadvertently also sent you another email around 6:07 p.m. that was intended for <redacted> Wang, one of the former Apple employees at issue. After we had emailed Mr. Wang yesterday about retaining Apple information, he promptly called me and offered to cooperate with Apple in resolving any issues. I then intended to email him again, but accidentally replied to my email chain with you instead. I apologize for the confusion that likely caused.
Yours,
Gabriel Gross Partner Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP <redacted> <redacted> <redacted> Direct <redacted> Mobile
Gabe
Hi Che,
Wanted to make sure to get back to you. Weil is our counsel on this matter, and I believe they should have contacted you explaining the miscommunication. Please feel free to direct any additional questions their way.
Thanks,
[Apple in-house legal counsel]


